+1

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> RC3 is compiled and tested on the following two systems, too. All tests
> passed.
>
> * CentOS 7.2 / Oracle JDK 1.8.0_77 / R 3.3.1
>    with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver
> -Dsparkr
> * CentOS 7.2 / Open JDK 1.8.0_102
>    with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver
>
> Cheers,
> Dongjoon
>
>
>
> On Saturday, September 24, 2016, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.0.1. The vote is open until Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 15:30 PDT and passes if
>> a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc3 (9d28cc10357a8afcfb2fa2e6eecb5
>> c2cc2730d17)
>>
>> This release candidate resolves 290 issues:
>> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira
>>
>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc3-bin/
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1201/
>>
>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc3-docs/
>>
>>
>> Q: How can I help test this release?
>> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>> reporting any regressions from 2.0.0.
>>
>> Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release?
>> A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.  Bugs already
>> present in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will
>> not necessarily block this release.
>>
>> Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0 from
>> now on?
>> A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a new RC
>> (i.e. RC4) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to 2.0.1.
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to