+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joseph Bradley <jos...@databricks.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 23:20 Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Shixiong(Ryan) Zhu >>> <shixi...@databricks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ＋1 >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Pete Lee <petermax...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier >>>>> <hvanhov...@databricks.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Ricardo Almeida >>>>>> <ricardo.alme...@actnowib.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Built and tested on >>>>>>> - Ubuntu 16.04 / OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 >>>>>>> - CentOS / Oracle Java 1.7.0_55 >>>>>>> (-Phadoop-2.7 -Dhadoop.version=2.7.3 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver >>>>>>> -Pyarn) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 25 September 2016 at 22:35, Matei Zaharia >>>>>>> <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matei >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Josh Rosen <joshro...@databricks.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:16 PM Yin Huai <yh...@databricks.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Dongjoon Hyun >>>>>>>>> <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> RC3 is compiled and tested on the following two systems, too. All >>>>>>>>>> tests passed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * CentOS 7.2 / Oracle JDK 1.8.0_77 / R 3.3.1 >>>>>>>>>> with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive >>>>>>>>>> -Phive-thriftserver -Dsparkr >>>>>>>>>> * CentOS 7.2 / Open JDK 1.8.0_102 >>>>>>>>>> with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive >>>>>>>>>> -Phive-thriftserver >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Dongjoon >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, September 24, 2016, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark >>>>>>>>>>> version 2.0.1. The vote is open until Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 15:30 >>>>>>>>>>> PDT and >>>>>>>>>>> passes if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1 >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc3 >>>>>>>>>>> (9d28cc10357a8afcfb2fa2e6eecb5c2cc2730d17) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This release candidate resolves 290 issues: >>>>>>>>>>> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be >>>>>>>>>>> found at: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc3-bin/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1201/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc3-docs/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Q: How can I help test this release? >>>>>>>>>>> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by >>>>>>>>>>> taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release >>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>>>>>>>>> then reporting any regressions from 2.0.0. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release? >>>>>>>>>>> A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Bugs >>>>>>>>>>> already present in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new >>>>>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>>> will not necessarily block this release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into >>>>>>>>>>> branch-2.0 from now on? >>>>>>>>>>> A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a >>>>>>>>>>> new RC (i.e. RC4) is cut, I will change the fix version of those >>>>>>>>>>> patches to >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.1. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards >>> >>> Jeff Zhang > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
