+1 On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >> 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 20:00 PDT and passes if a >> majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> >> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc4 (933d2c1ea4e5f5c4ec8d375b5ccaa >> 4577ba4be38) >> >> This release candidate resolves 301 issues: >> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira >> >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-bin/ >> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1203/ >> >> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-docs/ >> >> >> Q: How can I help test this release? >> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking >> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >> reporting any regressions from 2.0.0. >> >> Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release? >> A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Bugs already >> present in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will >> not necessarily block this release. >> >> Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0 from >> now on? >> A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a new RC >> (i.e. RC5) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to 2.0.1. >> >> >> > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
