I'd be happy to do the work of coordinating a 2.1.1 release if that's a thing a committer can do (I think the release coordinator for the most recent Arrow release was a committer and the final publish step took a PMC member to upload but other than that I don't remember any issues).
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > It seems reasonable to me, in that other x.y.1 releases have followed ~2 > months after the x.y.0 release and it's been about 3 months since 2.1.0. > > Related: creating releases is tough work, so I feel kind of bad voting for > someone else to do that much work. Would it make sense to deputize another > release manager to help get out just the maintenance releases? this may in > turn mean maintenance branches last longer. Experienced hands can continue > to manage new minor and major releases as they require more coordination. > > I know most of the release process is written down; I know it's also still > going to be work to make it 100% documented. Eventually it'll be necessary > to make sure it's entirely codified anyway. > > Not pushing for it myself, just noting I had heard this brought up in side > conversations before. > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:07 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote: > > Hi Spark Devs, > > Spark 2.1 has been out since end of December > <http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Announcing-Apache-Spark-2-1-0-td20390.html> > and we've got quite a few fixes merged for 2.1.1 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18281?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC> > . > > On the Python side one of the things I'd like to see us get out into a > patch release is a packaging fix (now merged) before we upload to PyPI & > Conda, and we also have the normal batch of fixes like toLocalIterator for > large DataFrames in PySpark. > > I've chatted with Felix & Shivaram who seem to think the R side is looking > close to in good shape for a 2.1.1 release to submit to CRAN (if I've > miss-spoken my apologies). The two outstanding issues that are being > tracked for R are SPARK-18817, SPARK-19237. > > Looking at the other components quickly it seems like structured streaming > could also benefit from a patch release. > > What do others think - are there any issues people are actively targeting > for 2.1.1? Is this too early to be considering a patch release? > > Cheers, > > Holden > -- > Cell : 425-233-8271 > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > > -- Cell : 425-233-8271 Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
