+1 from me too. Matei
> On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1. > > I think this architecture makes a lot of sense to let executors talk to > source/sink directly, and bring very low latency. > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +0 simply because I don't feel I know enough to have an opinion. I have no > reason to doubt the change though, from a skim through the doc. > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:37 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > Earlier I sent out a discussion thread for CP in Structured Streaming: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20928 > > It is meant to be a very small, surgical change to Structured Streaming to > enable ultra-low latency. This is great timing because we are also designing > and implementing data source API v2. If designed properly, we can have the > same data source API working for both streaming and batch. > > > Following the SPIP process, I'm putting this SPIP up for a vote. > > +1: Let's go ahead and design / implement the SPIP. > +0: Don't really care. > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
