+1 on the proposal.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:17 PM Hossein <fal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Shivaram, > > We converged on a CRAN release process that seems identical to current > SparkR. > > --Hossein > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman < > shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > >> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository / >> release issue discussed on SPIP ? >> >> Shivaram >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> > +1 >> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion. >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Hossein <fal...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM >> > To: dev@spark.apache.org >> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib >> pipelines in >> > R. >> > >> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib >> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for >> exposing >> > new API in future. >> > >> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote. >> > >> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP. >> > +0: Don't really care. >> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --Hossein >> > >
