Thank you, Sean and all. One decision was made swiftly today.
I believe that we can move forward case-by-case for the others until the feature freeze (3.0 branch cut). Bests, Dongjoon. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 13:03 Marco Gaido <marcogaid...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thanks for bringing this up. Honestly, my opinion is that Spark should be > fully ANSI SQL compliant. Where ANSI SQL compliance is not an issue, I am > fine following any other DB. IMHO, we won't get anyway 100% compliance with > any DB - postgres in this case (e.g. for decimal operations, we are > following SQLServer, and postgres behaviour would be very hard to meet) - > so I think it is fine that PMC members decide for each feature whether it > is worth to support it or not. > > Thanks, > Marco > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, 20:09 Sean Owen, <sro...@apache.org> wrote: > >> See the particular issue / question at >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24872#issuecomment-509108532 and >> the larger umbrella at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27764 -- Dongjoon rightly >> suggests this is a broader question. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
