Hi, Xingbo.

Currently, RC2 tag is pointing RC1 tag.

https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.0.0-preview-rc2

Could you cut from the HEAD of master branch?
Otherwise, nobody knows what release script you used for RC2.

Bests,
Dongjoon.



On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:15 PM Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This RC fails because:
> It fails to generate a PySpark release.
>
> I'll start RC2 soon.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Xingbo
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:10 PM Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sean, since we need to generate PySpark release with a different
>> name, I would prefer fail RC1 and start another release candidate.
>>
>> Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月30日周三 下午4:00写道:
>>
>>> I agree that we need a Pyspark release for this preview release. If
>>> it's a matter of producing it from the same tag, we can evaluate it
>>> within this same release candidate. Otherwise, just roll another
>>> release candidate.
>>>
>>> I was able to build it and pass all tests with JDK 8 and JDK 11
>>> (hadoop-3.2 profile, note) on Ubuntu, so this is otherwise looking
>>> good to me.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:01 PM Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>> version 3.0.0-preview.
>>> >
>>> > The vote is open until November 2 PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
>>> votes are cast, with
>>> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.0.0-preview
>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> >
>>> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>>> >
>>> > The tag to be voted on is v3.0.0-preview-rc1 (commit
>>> 5eddbb5f1d9789696927f435c55df887e50a1389):
>>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.0.0-preview-rc1
>>> >
>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-preview-rc1-bin/
>>> >
>>> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1334/
>>> >
>>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-preview-rc1-docs/
>>> >
>>> > The list of bug fixes going into 3.0.0 can be found at the following
>>> URL:
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12339177
>>> >
>>> > FAQ
>>> >
>>> > =========================
>>> > How can I help test this release?
>>> > =========================
>>> >
>>> > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>> > an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>> > reporting any regressions.
>>> >
>>> > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>> > the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>> > you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>> > with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>> > you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>> >
>>> > ===========================================
>>> > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.0.0?
>>> > ===========================================
>>> >
>>> > The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.0.0 can be found at:
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>>> Version/s" = 3.0.0
>>> >
>>> > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>> > fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>> > be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>> > appropriate release.
>>> >
>>> > ==================
>>> > But my bug isn't fixed?
>>> > ==================
>>> >
>>> > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>> > release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>> > release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>> > that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>> > help target the issue.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to