I'm seeing the effort of including the correctness issue SPARK-28067 [1] to
3.0.0 via SPARK-31894 [2]. That doesn't seem to be a regression so
technically doesn't block the release, so while it'd be good to weigh its
worth (it requires some SS users to discard the state so might bring less
frightened requiring it in major version upgrade), it looks to be optional
to include SPARK-28067 to 3.0.0.

Besides, I see all blockers look to be resolved, thanks all for the amazing
efforts!

+1 (non-binding) if the decision of SPARK-28067 is "later".

1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28067
2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31894

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:23 AM Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Matei
>
> On Jun 7, 2020, at 6:53 AM, Maxim Gekk <maxim.g...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> I don't see any ongoing PR to fix critical bugs in my area.
>> Bests,
>> Takeshi
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 1:20 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apologies for the mistake. The vote is open till 11:59pm Pacific time
>>>> on Mon June 9th.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 1:08 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>> version 3.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote is open until [DUE DAY] and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes
>>>>> are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.0.0
>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.0.0-rc3 (commit
>>>>> 3fdfce3120f307147244e5eaf46d61419a723d50):
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.0.0-rc3
>>>>>
>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-rc3-bin/
>>>>>
>>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1350/
>>>>>
>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-rc3-docs/
>>>>>
>>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.0.0 can be found at the following
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12339177
>>>>>
>>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.0.0-rc3.
>>>>>
>>>>> FAQ
>>>>>
>>>>> =========================
>>>>> How can I help test this release?
>>>>> =========================
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>
>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.0.0?
>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>
>>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.0.0 can be found at:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>>>>> Version/s" = 3.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>>>> appropriate release.
>>>>>
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>>>> ==================
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>>>> help target the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>
>
>

Reply via email to