Thank you all. This vote passed.
I'll conclude this vote and prepare the release.

Dongjoon

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:54 PM sarutak <saru...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:

> I noticed that `TimestampNTZ` is intentionally hidden from the doc.
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35313#issuecomment-1185194701
>
> So, it's better to remove notes about TimestampNTZ from the doc.
> But I don't think this issue is not a blocker, so +1 on this RC.
>
> Kousuke
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > FYI we had further discussions on
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35313#issuecomment-1185195455.
> > Thanks for pointing that out, but this document issue should not be a
> > blocker of the release.
> >
> > +1 on the RC.
> >
> > Gengliang
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:22 PM sarutak <saru...@oss.nttdata.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dongjoon and Bruce,
> >>
> >> SPARK-36724 is about SessionWindow, while SPARK-38017 and PR #35313
> >> are
> >> about TimeWindow, and TimeWindow already supports TimestampNTZ in
> >> v3.2.1.
> >>
> >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/4f25b3f71238a00508a356591553f2dfa89f8290/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/TimeWindow.scala#L99
> >>
> >> So, I think that change still valid.
> >>
> >> Kousuke
> >>
> >>> Thank you so much, Bruce.
> >>>
> >>> After SPARK-36724 landed at Spark 3.3.0, SPARK-38017 seems to land
> >> at
> >>> branch-3.2 mistakenly here.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35313
> >>>
> >>> I believe I can remove those four places after uploading the docs
> >> to
> >>> our website.
> >>>
> >>> Dongjoon.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:16 PM Bruce Robbins
> >> <bersprock...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> A small thing. The function API doc (here [1]) claims that the
> >>>> window function accepts a timeColumn of TimestampType or
> >>>> TimestampNTZType. The update to the API doc was made since
> >> v3.2.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> As far as I can tell, 3.2.2 doesn't support TimestampNTZType.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:58 PM Dongjoon Hyun
> >>>> <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> >>>>> version 3.2.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote is open until July 15th 1AM (PST) and passes if a
> >>>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.2.2
> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
> >>>>> https://spark.apache.org/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.2.2-rc1 (commit
> >>>>> 78a5825fe266c0884d2dd18cbca9625fa258d7f7):
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.2.2-rc1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >>>>> found at:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.2-rc1-bin/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1409/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.2-rc1-docs/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.2.2 can be found at the
> >>>>> following URL:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12351232
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.2.2-rc1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FAQ
> >>>>>
> >>>>> =========================
> >>>>> How can I help test this release?
> >>>>> =========================
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
> >>>>> taking
> >>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release
> >> candidate,
> >>>>> then
> >>>>> reporting any regressions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and
> >>>>> install
> >>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
> >>>>> Java/Scala
> >>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers
> >> and
> >>>>> test
> >>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache
> >> before/after
> >>>>> so
> >>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ===========================================
> >>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.2.2?
> >>>>> ===========================================
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.2.2 can be found
> >>>>> at:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for
> >>>>> "Target Version/s" = 3.2.2
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important
> >>>>> bug
> >>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility
> >>>>> should
> >>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
> >>>>> appropriate release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ==================
> >>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
> >>>>> ==================
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
> >>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the
> >>>>> previous
> >>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a
> >>>>> regression
> >>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a
> >> committer
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> help target the issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dongjoon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Links:
> >>> ------
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.2-rc1-docs/_site/api/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions$.html
> >>
> >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>

Reply via email to