On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:55:29 +0200, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I don't contribute to struts but I have to say that one of the > distinguishing > features of the ( less mature ) springframework is that action forms don't have > to inherit a concrete class. > > There has been a lot of criticism of this ( ActionForm etc ) in the past.
It has also been pointed out, many many times, why this is a *good* thing. You'll find those reasons in the archives. -- Martin Cooper > > I think it would be a very bad idea not to go forward with this POJO support. > > In fact for struts 2 it would be a good idea to get rid of inheritance > and support > POJO instead with option to implement certain interfaces/attributes for > certain behaviour such as a validation interface etc etc. > > --b > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:43:58 -0500, Durham David R Jr Contr 805 > > > CSPTS/SCE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are no guarantees for the future but the > > > convention in Struts is that we maintain backward compatibility and > > IMO > > > someone would have to have good reason to remove it and break > > compatibility > > > once it has been "released"- at least in the 1.x.x series (Struts 2.0 > > > revolution is another case). > > > > On this subject, has anyone mentioned anything about conversion > > utilities from Struts 1.x to Struts 2.0? I'm thinking it would make > > sense to design and develop these kinds of tools along side the Struts > > 2.0 development. > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
