Date: 2004-10-31T00:10:00 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush
no comment Change Log: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31230 31230] - Multiple classes using deprecated DefinitionsUtil class - Patch to DefinitionDispatcherAction could be considered, and the rest tabled for 1.3. -* [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML - Could be invalid +* '''[http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501 31501]''' - html:form focus generates non-XHTML - Could be invalid * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31642 31642] - <bean:include> always include Session id (if any) even for external Urls (href attribute) - Patch could be considered @@ -42,20 +42,7 @@ * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827 31827] - Bug in validation part - Could be a support issue = Thought-Holder = -== Follow-up to Ted's Post == - -Are there any glaring inconsistencies in the posted documents with the Tomcat release philosophy? - -== Release Thoughts == - -So ... according to the release plan we're over-due a vote? Actually, that's getting the cart before the horse, isn't it? What about bugzilla? We still need to address that, don't we? Most everything there is an enhancement. There are a few issues, but, IMHO, nothing we're going to solve before this release gets cut. - -Are there any show stoppers for anyone? -May we proceed to defer outstanding issues to 1.2.6? ... or are we moving on to 1.3? I need to look at the roadmap I suppose an get a feel for what our current direction is. - -In any case, it seems to me bugzilla has yet to be dealt with and needs to be. From there, as I understand it, there should be a build made that we all test as thoroughly as we can - and vote on. I agree with your earlier statement about not voting +1 unless you have the utmost confidence in the build from having battle-tested it, that is, provided quorum may be reached with those who can't battle-test abstaining from the vote. In the end, however, it's up to each of us to vote our conscience, regardless of whether or not we can battle-test. - -If that's unintelligible, I claim sleep-deprivation! :-) +(Empty) ---- CategoryHomepage --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
