>I updated that, and the velocity prefix, yesterday. Ah... Ok.. cheers Ted. Looks like I am a bit out dated. :-)
> For the validator framework, is the "Classname-alias-validation.xml" > syntax working? Yes, i believe it is. > The next biggest task is following up with the taglib proposal. > (Starting with refreshing the TLD file from the WW head.) Ok, have we decided on this yet? that is to maintain only the tld (by hand) and have all the examples in the tld as well. If so, I think we'll have to remove all the xdoclet tags as well to avoid confusion. > But, since it's optional for 2.0, that could also wait for 2.0.1 or so. Ok then. > We should also update the Showcase example so that they do not use the > ! alias syntax. Agree. I think we have a jira issue for this already. rgds. ----- Original Message ---- From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>; tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 21 August, 2006 7:33:35 AM Subject: Re: [s2] Freemarker transform name I updated that, and the velocity prefix, yesterday. (Check out your Hangman example!) The next biggest task is following up with the taglib proposal. (Starting with refreshing the TLD file from the WW head.) We should also update the Showcase example so that they do not use the ! alias syntax. (For the validator framework, is the "Classname-alias-validation.xml" syntax working? Without that, we have to flex the stack or create stub subclasses.) With those two things, and a final pass on the documentation, we should be good to go for 2.0.0. The third remaining task is completing the remaining 10% of the new API, utilizing it for our own examples, and updating the relevant documentation. But, since it's optional for 2.0, that could also wait for 2.0.1 or so. -Ted. On 8/21/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > If not mistaken i think we came to the conclusion to rename Struts2 > Freemarker transform from saf to s such that instead of doing > > <@saf.property value="...." /> > > we would do > > <@s.property value="...." /> > > Just want to confirm this, cause I've notice the its not changed to "s" yet. > I could make the changes within these few days, if the above is correct. > > Tia. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
