Hi,

> On 2. Apr 2024, at 16:40, Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I'll see if I find somebody on Slack to maybe provide more insight into ICLA 
> vs Section 5.

So folks on the ASF Slack back both ;) Essentially it boils down to risk 
management I guess.

So this are my thoughts:

If we accept contributions under Section 5 / without ICLA, we are at a larger 
risk that the contribution may be contested. So we should not do this for 
significant contributions - but
if somebody corrects a typo, fixes a trivial bug, etc. it might be acceptable 
risk.

If possible, an ICLA should be requested. 

In particular it must be provided before anybody actually may become a 
committer.

Cheers,

-- Richard

Reply via email to