I'd say 3.6 and not 3.5 in order to maintain the stable character of the latter.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:05 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il ven 11 ott 2019, 23:48 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > Per recent discussions we should really push for 3.6+, esp given lessons > > learned from 3.5 and the plan to get 3.6stable out there quickly. > > > > Is there a strong reason for 3.5? What are the implications of 3.5, ie > does > > it break b/w compat or just additive? (etc...) > > > > It is just additive but it is not a trivial change. > > In my opinion we should put it in 3.6. > > I guess we will see 3.6.0 delivered before the end of this year. > > > Enrico > > > > > Patrick > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:34 PM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > Mohammad would like to add Audit logging to 3.5 branch as a new feature > > > once the patch is ready. > > > > > > 3.5 is already locked for adding new features, so I would say it should > > be > > > added to 3.6 only, but that’s only me. What do you think about that? > > > > > > Shall we backport audit logging to 3.5 branch? > > > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > > > > >
