So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26? The
emails are annoying but I'm more concerned that things will be broken when
branch from rawhide happens.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm
> having.
> >
> > I keep getting this email:
> > >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > >On ppc64le:
> > > orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love
> > >Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
> > This is because it's noarch that depends on "love", which doesn't
> compile on ppc64le.
> >
> > I added an exclusive arch to the spec in hopes to silence this:
> > >ExclusiveArch: %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64 %{mips} aarch64 ppc64 noarch
> >
> > Is this not sufficient anymore for noarch? Or is this a bug in buildsys?
>
> I recently filed similar thing against pungi:
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/87
>
> Pavel
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
