On 12/30/2016 01:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/30/2016 12:49 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not
>> in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches.
>> Is this intentional? Should I just add libatomic as a BR?
>>
>> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17115104
>
> dnsdist-1.1.0/m4/pdns_check_os.m4 has this:
>
> case "$host" in
> mips*)
> LDFLAGS="-latomic $LDFLAGS"
> ;;
> powerpc*)
> LDFLAGS="-latomic $LDFLAGS"
> ;;
> esac
>
> If you link against libatomic explicitly, you need to specify a
> suitable build dependency.
>
> (If the dependency on libatomic is introduced by a build dependency,
> that build dependency would in turn have to depend on libatomic, and
> not your package.)
Understood, but why do the aarch64, armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le buildroot
have this by default, but not ppc64?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
