On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> If the kernel team wants some specific help with ia32 support then > 2 things need to happen: > > 1) A clear request for help needs to be send > 2) What exactly they need help with needs to be clearly defined Has happened multiple times over two years. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/208368.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GSIXKLR5RP5OIF6XMDP2WWYOKD4Y5LFM/ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NJF45R5WFYVDJQJILQEWU2I4ADRYMAFN/ I'm not sure how it could be more clear. Of course, it could have been trolled better by someone, by wiping out the original subject and substituting -- Fedora: "death to i686!" -- > Last as others have said, this is _clearly_ a systemwide change > and the deadline for systemwide change proposals for F27 was July > 4th, where as this page was created July 6th, moreover a change as > big as this really needs to be discussed out in the open long before > it gets implemented rather then hidden away in a Changes page. I see it both ways. It is self-contained in that it's strictly the kernel without affecting user space at all. But it's system-wide in that it does affect the distribution, it's effectively dropping the hardware support for an entire architecture. But anyway, dropping i686 kernel is not a surprise to me, this has been a rather long leadout train. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
