-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:29 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > * base100 > > https://github.com/AdamNiederer/base100 > > Encode things into Emoji. > > > > Base💯 can represent any byte with a unique emoji symbol, therefore it ca > > n represent binary data with zero printable overhead (see caveats for more > > info). > > Hmm, it seems that those package are not yet available. > I see that rust-base100 was built in koji, but it's not available in repos. > Same for fd-find and exa... Not sure what's going on here.
Hmm, [root@e22df69ecc1c /]# dnf install base100 fd-find ripgrep tokei --assumeno Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:51 ago on Tue Nov 28 09:45:50 2017. Dependencies resolved. =============================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Installing: base100 x86_64 0.4.1-1.fc28 rawhide 347 k fd-find x86_64 6.0.0-3.fc28 rawhide 679 k ripgrep x86_64 0.7.1-5.fc28 rawhide 936 k tokei x86_64 6.1.2-4.fc28 rawhide 555 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Install 4 Packages Total download size: 2.5 M Installed size: 7.6 M Operation aborted. exa is not yet available seems because still not in compose, but should be there within few days (next compose). > On a related note: why is "exa" called "rust-exa"? The "rust-" prefix seems > uncessary, for executables, since from the user's POV the implementation > language is just an implementation detail. For libraries it'd be different. > Same situation occurs with python programs, and the guidelines do _not_ > prescribe python-dnf, but just dnf, etc. Is there any chance we could > drop the "rust-" prefix from user programs? We have "rust-" prefix for all packages coming from crates.io because people can easily turn their packages to contain library too which would be kinda inconsistent without renaming whole package to contain prefix. But the good thing is that even sourcerpm is called `rust-exa`, binary rpm is named `exa`, so users will always do `dnf install exa` and it will work for them (and it will install `exa`, not `rust-exa` package). I hope this makes sense. If not, we would be happy to discuss it. Just open a ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/sig > Zbyszek - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlodMe4ACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0yFPQ//VdttLEcxqt/+y2upGCEf2HDEvSvejwObOCJtBa3ZexXRWJKwfYVqGP0I o3F+OwO/Es7EtNfkpzxfcHWf0LGhK1Hb51xoMn1Y1gXnQdVI9tZ4x5052V1e126/ naPu9rfQ48dK+LKHXJbDQ6wTABQXsw5uF2mFCzvKs5ez5nQiKlRKUoB839MzfUBY zICypU/03WKQGqQE4QseZCKaKgnZqDrvi5dhGN/f5jrJM6KvzBRhA/Kwhl/Gx/Q6 9fsXm1tlQZe3pkMhuESLXjI6ezjKC+yoYW4eYpazVZS91awiDDasuKf5AAn+k/Jl vrphKcUg/8IZVMLW4cx1E/yv35+K0GQZ9k5135V8qtlAI0Wz1B9bGvkzB9zumXfi QYHrYLsacliogfQaqeGwKfk+KDsHzfDT0Vr2QvuS2a0T/Gd7umHajNjfqgz8Bq2T FhPpMMlLnBgafwXRGeFd1j1kWcmXgZwqFlLVcDNvPHmfhQILu5FpWDmJySEUwWkK LFk63vSXiP0v5nq3OSsEcgsvyb36mhOSZBgvXe9cieBsSCtkkS+Fa03q+vWi1v+P P3K/f7SQ7lWmsDUqrXzJnlNLhJYGR0T8mEGNB1l4OjNj7fIsu3m4ihaqC7wisn9H +SftZtppF4HBni/8HO8bcH7SUyvEW8oSSY9/24Qn38LvURlezbo= =OYzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
