Le 03/04/2018 à 19:44, Dennis Gilmore a écrit : > El mar, 03-04-2018 a las 17:07 +0000, Stephen Gallagher escribió: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek <c@petersen-glombek >> .de> wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud!I have already done the >>> packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various dependencies. >>> Unfortunately there is no upgrade path from the EOL'd v10 rpm that >>> is in Fedora right now, which seems to be somewhat of a blocker. >>> I'd happily support upgrades from v13 but I have no interest in >>> packaging old versions (I might reconsider if dependency bundling >>> were allowed for these "upgrade path" rpms). >> >> Could you explain more about what you would need to do to clean the >> upgrade path from v10? I'm not sure what you meant above. > > nextcloud requires that in order to get to nextcloud 13 from 10, you > upgrade to 11 then to 12 then finally to 13. you have to run the > upgrade process in order to keep things working. they do not support > skipping versions > Dennis
So, I don't think we can update the package from 10 to 13, thus breaking all user installations. I see 2 possible way The classical one - create nextcloud11, nextcloud12 and nextcloud13 packages and also future versions, older can be removed when EOLed by upstream (so nextcloud + nextcloud10 removed in F29) The new one (F28+) - create a nextcloud module with 1 stream per version, following upstream life cycle Remi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
