Dne 29. 01. 19 v 20:31 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:42, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:41:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>     > >This feels more like system-wide change…
>     > >Especially since you say that some extra packages will be retired.
>     >
>     > A very limited set. The distro as a whole should not be impacted
>     by this.
>     >
>     > The retired packages are legacy cruft. And the important stuff that
>     > needs to be updated needs some motivation like this.
>
>     "This change needs to motivate other important stuff that we don't
>     have
>     direct control over to change" seems like *exactly* the reason we
>     ask for
>     system-wide changes to be filed earlier.
>
>
>
> This is like the 4th system wide change this release which is coming
> in as a Self-Contained. Each time the developer thinks it is
> self-contained because it is just one  little thing, but on regards it
> turns into being a system-wide change. However because the two
> deadlines are one after the other, it means that this change is pushed
> out another 6 months where the 3-4 weeks between System-Wide and
> Self-Contained doesn't seem very long. Can we either:
>
> 1) Move System-Wide and Self-Contained proposal deadlines to be the
> same date and allow FESCO/etc determine if the proposal needs to be
> moved to SW or SC then?


This split between SW and SC was artificial since the beginning and I'd
be happy if we dropped it.

If we keep this division, I am for one deadline for both.


Vít


> 2) Move Self-Contained deadline BEFORE System-Wide so that  if it is
> really  System-Wide move it to the correct category?
> 3) Add a re-evaluate deadline after the first two? This allows us to
> get an idea that "oh wait this is going to really mess things up and
> we need to push this out one release?" or other items
>
> At the moment, I think pushing out removal of yum3 for Fedora31
> doesn't make sense if there isn't enough python2 for it to be useful
> in Fedora30. However I also think this is a system-wide change because
> a lot of tools need time to test that they REALLY do support not
> having yum3 in them. 
>
>
> -- 
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to