On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:08:14PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 19 16:32, Michal Domonkos wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:46 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>Based on the entire discussion so far, here's my proposal: > >> > >> - we change this to a system wide change > >> - we move it to Fedora 31 > >> - we retire the packages from rawhide as soon as f30 is branched > >> regardless of > >>the dependent packages > >> - packages with broken deps / FTBFS due to this will be retired if not > >> fixed > >>by beta freeze > >> > >>Contingency mechanism: > >> > >> - if some process (releng or similar) needs the packages in order to ship > >>Fedora 31, the packages are added into a designated copr repo maintained by > >>the > >>person/team responsible for the tool that needs yum (or other packages > >>retired) > >> > >> - if the above is not possible and the packages are indeed needed in the > >>actual f31 repos, packages are unretired but the person/team responsible > >>for the > >>tool that needs yum maintains them as long as they need them and retires > >>them > >>once that is no longer true > > > >+1 > > > >As an alternative solution, based on a discussion with Neal Gompa > >today on IRC, I propose the following: > > > > - we remove python-urlgrabber from the original change proposal > >(i.e. keeping it in F30) > > - we proceed with the retirement of the rest of the YUM stack in F30 > > - we make sure the kojid PR[1] is merged in time for F30 > > > >This is based on the following two facts: > > > > - python-urlgrabber seems to be the last component of the YUM stack > >that turns this proposal into a "system-wide" change, due to a number > >of infra bits that require it (sigul, koji-containerbuild, osc or > >imagefactory). Therefore, if we just postpone the removal of > >python-urlgrabber to F31 and merge that kojid PR, we could perhaps > >agree on re-qualifying the change as "self-contained" (plus, there's > >also the possibility of porting[2] python-urlgrabber to Python 3, but > >that's for a separate discussion) > > - the kojid PR[1] is also in-line with another F30 change[3], so > >there should be enough incentive to have it merged > > > >Before I go ahead and edit the proposal: Does this variant make sense to you? > > It does to me. But well, I've been called a Python 2 deletionist > before, so not sure if I'm not biased :)
FWIW, I like this "alternative proposal" better too. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
