On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:29:23AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:30:28AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:48 AM Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> writes: > > > > > > > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss: > > > > > > > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > > > > ○ Pull-requests are automatically tested > > > > ○ Every commit to dist-git (ie: PR merged) is automatically built in > > > > koji > > > > ○ Every build in koji results automatically in an update in bodhi > > > > ○ Every update in bodhi is automatically tested > > > > ○ If the tests pass, the update is automatically pushed to the > > > > repository > > > > > > I have a *lot* of objections to this workflow, but maybe it'd be better > > > to take a step back. > > > > > > Instead of trying to create a new workflow, why are you not starting > > > with defining what we have now? And if there are problems with it that > > > need to be addressed, what are they and why do they motivate these > > > changes to you? > > > > > > > I'd like to second this question. > > What are the problems with our current workflows? > > At the beginning of this message you said there were several packaging > > initiatives being worked on, but for those of us that didn't go to > > Flock, we don't know what those are. > > There was a talk from Neil that has been linked to elsewhere in this thread
Oups, the talk was from Neal and Igor. Sorry for the typo there. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
