On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request > > new branches on that repo? > > * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request? > > Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my packages on EPEL, I am > fine with anybody requesting EPEL branches for them as long as they do the > work and don't expect me to do anything to those branches (which is not > going to happen). > I think this might be a good time point out that it's actually possible to override the default assignee for a component for EPEL bugs (also for fedora) in bugzilla by adding this override in the releng/fedora-scm-requests repo for the respective package, like here: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/jackson-databind (Note that lef was actually deemed non-responsive some months back, so this is probably not a good example of a package where this split responsibility "worked".) Fabio > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
