Hi,

as a bind-utils maintainer, I have to ask. Why is dig -t TYPE61 used,
when all stable Fedora supports dig -t OPENPGPKEY just fine. Type61
might be used as fallback for older releases

On 2/12/21 8:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> All Fedora's GPG key - starting with Fedora 27 - are now stored in
> fedoraproject.org DNS record and can be verified using DNSSEC.
> 
> Why? How it can be used? That is long story and you can read about it in
> my blog entry:
>   
> http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2021/02/11/verify_package_gpg_signature_using_dnssec/index.html
> 
> 
> Few last minutes notes here:
>  - there are still some gotchas which should be fixed. But enough code
> is already in production - you can play with it now. Relevant issues are
> linked in the blog post.
>  - the DNF team is migrating their code to libdnf, I do not have any
> guarantee when this piece of code will be migrating - so we are far from
> enabling this by default.
> 
> Comments are welcomed.

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to