On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On 10.04.2021 23:16, PGNet Dev wrote: > > https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION/#type-1-boot-loader-specification-entries > > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-boot.html > > I think the Extended Boot Loader Partition is not suitable for Fedora > yet because it does not support symlinks (FAT32 by specification)
"$BOOT must be a file system readable by the firmware" That condition is met by efifs, ergo by wrapping GRUB file system modules as EFI file system drivers. For non-UEFI, in effect, the spec insists that $BOOT is FAT. And I think that's fine for systemd-boot to implement a subset of the spec and have such a requirement, it is not OK for the spec to have arbitrary requirements. >and > Fedora's grub2 contains at least one: > > $ sudo file /boot/grub2/grubenv > /boot/grub2/grubenv: symbolic link to ../efi/EFI/fedora/grubenv grubenv and grub.cfg are no longer on the ESP, starting with Fedora 34. Both are located in /boot/grub2/ as a result of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnifyGrubConfig -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
