On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard <tstel...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 6/16/21 10:58 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 6/16/21 2:11 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:56 AM Tom Stellard <tstel...@redhat.com
> <mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     On 5/7/21 10:48 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>      >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fail_rpmbuild <
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fail_rpmbuild>
> >>      >
> >>      > == Summary ==
> >>      > Enable broken RPATH detection
> >>      > [
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_brp_buildroot_policy_scripts
> <
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_brp_buildroot_policy_scripts
> >
> >>      > buildroot policy] script by default. This will make the RPM
> build fail
> >>      > once a broken RPATH was detected within a binary or a shared
> library
> >>      > file. An opt-out mechanism will be provided as well.
> >>      >
> >>      > == Owner ==
> >>      > * Name: [[User:cstratak| Charalampos Stratakis]]
> >>      > * Email: cstratak AT redhat.com <http://redhat.com>
> >>      >
> >>      >
> >>
> >>     Hi,
> >>
> >>     Was there any testing done to determine how much this script would
> increase
> >>     build times?  I've noticed it takes quite a while on the kernel
> builds, and
> >>     I'm curious what factors influence how long the script takes.  Is it
> >>     number of binaries, binary sizes, etc?
> >>
> >>     -Tom
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >>     To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >>     Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ <
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
> >>     List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines <
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
> >>     List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> <
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
> >>     Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure <
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey Tom,
> >>
> >> Unfortunately no, a potential increase in build time was not taken into
> account at the time of the implementation of this change, as it never came
> up when considering other buildroot policy scripts as well.
> >>
> >> Here is the actual script that runs:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.16.x/scripts/check-rpaths-worker
> <
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.16.x/scripts/check-rpaths-worker
> >
> >>
> >> Could you try and compare two scratch builds? One as is and one by
> adding |%global __brp_check_rpaths %{nil} |at the SPEC?|
> >> |
> >>
> >
> > Instead of doing two scratch builds, I just added:
> > %global __brp_check_rpaths time /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths to the spec
> file
> > and did a scratch build[1].
> >
> > The results on x86_64 were:
> >
> > real    13m51.517s
> > user    8m53.216s
> > sys    7m34.105s
> >
> > Overall build time for the scratch build was 88m37s, so  that means
> check-rpaths
> > accounted for 15% of the build time.  I'm going to do some more tests on
> some
> > of the larger packages I maintain (llvm and clang) and see what the
> impact is.
> >
>
> LLVM was ~2 minutes and clang ~30 seconds, so not that big of an impact.
> The
> kernel build might just be an outlier.
>
> -Tom
>
> > I do think it would be worth trying to profile the script and see if
> there is
> > room for optimization.
> >
> > - Tom
> >
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70270039
> >
> >
> >
> >> Also adding here for completion that the script will also check for
> RUNPATH as of rpm 4.17:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1487/files <
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1487/files>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Charalampos Stratakis
> >> Senior Software Engineer
> >> Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> >>
> >
>
>
Optimization PR upstream:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1714

-- 
Regards,

Charalampos Stratakis
Senior Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to