Hi Sahana,

it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to
watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has
a new release, I am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where
should I watch for a progress. Even build of openssl itself does not
reference any bug. Is there any better tracker than bug #1825937, which
I can monitor for progress? Is the koji build the best way to check
readiness? Does exist any variant of RHEL9 bug #1958021
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958021> for Fedora Rawhide?

Is there any expected timeline, how long it might take to merge the
side-tag?

Thanks!

Regards,
Petr

On 9/14/21 6:56 PM, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The builds of packages that depend on OpenSSL are being rebuilt in the
> side tag f36-build-side-44794 [1] now.
>
> Note to package maintainers:  If you see a "Rebuilt with OpenSSL
> 3.0.0" commit in your package, do not build it in
> regular rawhide unless the side tag is merged
>
> [1]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=44794&order=-build_id&latest=1
> <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=44794&order=-build_id&latest=1>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Sahana Prasad
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:06 PM Sahana Prasad <sah...@redhat.com
> <mailto:sah...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:35 PM Omair Majid <oma...@redhat.com
>     <mailto:oma...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Sahana Prasad <sah...@redhat.com <mailto:sah...@redhat.com>>
>         writes:
>
>         > An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0
>         final RC
>         > (released upstream yesterday)
>
>         Thanks for doing this!
>
>         I read the upstream announcement and it certainly reads like
>         it's the
>         final/GA release, not an RC:
>
>         https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07/OpenSSL3.Final/
>         <https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2021/09/07/OpenSSL3.Final/>
>
>         Do you know what's going on? Did they phrase it badly or did they
>         perform multiple releases in parallel?
>
>
>     Hi Omair,
>
>     Sorry I phrased it incorrectly. It is the final major version
>     only, not the RC.
>
>     Thank you,
>     Regards,
>     Sahana Prasad
>
>
>         Thanks,
>         Omair
>
>         --
>         PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/ <http://pgp.mit.edu/>)
>         Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to