On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:41 AM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 11:31 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 1:23 AM Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > > > > > My rawhide system seem to have both and boot even other kernel: > > > > > > tree /boot/efi > > > /boot/efi > > > ├── 6a1b72cbb94d4c95a4ac9df2d581e371 > > > │ ├── 0-rescue > > > │ │ ├── initrd > > > │ │ └── linux > > > │ ├── 4.16.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc29.x86_64 > > > │ ├── 4.16.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc29.x86_64 > > > │ ├── 4.16.0-0.rc7.git1.1.fc29.x86_64 > > > │ └── 5.16.0-0.rc5.20211216git2b14864acbaa.37.fc36.x86_64 > > > │ ├── initrd > > > │ └── linux > > > ├── EFI > > > │ ├── BOOT > > > │ │ ├── BOOTX64.EFI > > > │ │ └── fbx64.efi > > > │ └── fedora > > > │ ├── BOOTX64.CSV > > > │ ├── grub.cfg > > > │ ├── grub.cfg.rpmsave > > > │ ├── grubenv.rpmsave > > > │ ├── grubx64.efi > > > │ ├── mmx64.efi > > > │ ├── shim.efi > > > │ └── shimx64.efi > > > └── loader > > > └── entries > > > └── > > > > > > 6a1b72cbb94d4c95a4ac9df2d581e371-5.16.0-0.rc5.20211216git2b14864acbaa.37.fc36.x86_64.conf > > > > Does > > /boot/efi/loader/entries/6a1b72cbb94d4c95a4ac9df2d581e371-5.16.0-0.rc5.20211216git2b14864acbaa.37.fc36.x86_64.conf > > contain reference to the files > > /6a1b72cbb94d4c95a4ac9df2d581e371/5.16.0-0.rc5.20211216git2b14864acbaa.37.fc36.x86_64/linux > > /6a1b72cbb94d4c95a4ac9df2d581e371/5.16.0-0.rc5.20211216git2b14864acbaa.37.fc36.x86_64/initrd > > In my case it did. > > > And does this rc5 boot entry appear in GRUB but just isn't the > > default? Or is it missing? > > For me I think it didn't appear at all, but I'm not 100% sure. Even if > it appeared, would it work? Would grub know to look for the files on > the ESP?
Yes. BLS snippets don't support references to other file systems. If GRUB blscfg looks on the ESP at all for /loader/entries, and thus can read the conf files there, then it can also find the kernel and initrd, since those are referenced relative to the file system the conf files are located on. But I suspect from the code that blscfg doesn't look on the ESP at all. > It should be easy to experiment with this, anyway - all you need to do > is have systemd 250 installed, and create the directories > /boot/efi/loader/entries and /boot/efi/(yourmachineid). Doing so will > reproduce the bug, and you can run kernel-install yourself and have it > create this style of entry and see what it looks like and how it works. True. But you know how lazy I am. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
