On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > > > Thanks for forwarding this announcement. > > Apparently the talk about "improving communication between RHBZ and > > the Fedora Project" has not born fruit yet. ;) > > Well the announcement was public, I recommend subscribing to > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-announce-list if you > interact with bugzilla a lot. > > > Do we know if any of our tools and scripts that interact with RHBZ > > will get broken by this? > > I assume you have an eye on at least some of the releng scripts (FTI, > > FTBFS, etc.). > > I will check. I think it's all broken. > > > But what about fedora-review? fedora-create-review? The tool that > > syncs assignees from dist-git to RHBZ? > > No idea.
Most of these tools are written in python and as the email says, the most recent version of python-bugzilla works fine (which is already in Fedora and EPEL - stable). So as long as your systems are up to date, it should be somewhat transparent. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
