Hello all,

The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently
switched from providing a shared library to a static library.

So I'm going to make changes in the package, and provide everything in
"-devel" subpackage.
I have looked through
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries
requirements — but there are some questions left.

1) Should I preserve debug information for the static library during build,
so the library can be stripped and debug packages can be created? Or, can I
just skip  debug package creation with  "%global debug_package %{nil}" ?
I know it's acceptable for header-only, but not sure for packages with
binary static libraries.

2) Can I use the stripping LDFLAGS option ("-s") right during the static
package build, not to strip anything after build? Or, let the built library
be stripped in terms of RPM package flow?

Thanks!

-- 
wbr, Denis.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to