Hello all, The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently switched from providing a shared library to a static library.
So I'm going to make changes in the package, and provide everything in "-devel" subpackage. I have looked through https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries requirements — but there are some questions left. 1) Should I preserve debug information for the static library during build, so the library can be stripped and debug packages can be created? Or, can I just skip debug package creation with "%global debug_package %{nil}" ? I know it's acceptable for header-only, but not sure for packages with binary static libraries. 2) Can I use the stripping LDFLAGS option ("-s") right during the static package build, not to strip anything after build? Or, let the built library be stripped in terms of RPM package flow? Thanks! -- wbr, Denis.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure