On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:



On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote:
      I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted
      against trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK
      with a SONAME bump was built  for f37+ but not all dependencies
      rebuilt.


This was announced back in July while F37 was still 
Rawhide:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
/thread/PD3EWAYG6HGKSWU5T337AXU4ONSK53VZ/#LYLHTVJQMLOWFFRB25MVM4S4726KPWMR


And looking at the commit history for the F37 branch of trustedqsl, it has a
commit referencing the wxGTK 3.2 version bump:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/trustedqsl/commits/f37, and that was
before the update you did to version 2.6.4. The build for 2.6.4 on 
F37(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/trustedqsl/2.6.4/1.fc37/data/
logs/x86_64/build.log) also seems to have pulled the wxWidgets 3.2 dep
correctly, with CMake reporting:

Found wxWidgets: -pthread;;;-lwx_gtk3u_core-3.2;-lwx_baseu-3.2;-lwx_gtk3u_ht
ml-3.2 (found version "3.2.0") and the RPM dependency generator showing

libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk
3u_core-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_core-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gt
k3u_html-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_html-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit)
 
I am therefore very confused how the user could have 2.6.4 with a 3.1.5
dependency when the koji build for 2.6.4-1 shows wxGTK 3.2 in the buildroot
and as a dependency.

Agreed ^^^

Scott
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to