On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:38 PM Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > So I plan to go ahead with this rebase and rebuilding these packages > > after the mass rebuild if that's okay. > > Hi, > does the new version change any API and/or soname version? >
I don't think so and the test results look quite good actually (only neochat fails due to cmark-0.30.2): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/cmark/monitor/ (I think upstream is a bit conservative with still linking the SONAME to the version.) so I think we can go ahead and push this to rawhide. > > We can consider whether to backport to F37 and possibly F36 if needed > > afterwards. > > I do not think you should change API/soname version in stable releases, > that can lead to trouble (for example for 3rd-party packages). You are right - let's not plan to do that yet, though I know one new dependent package newly needs 0.30. Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
