Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
the following changes [*].
1. Edit /etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl. Change:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
to:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf5'
2. Run 'mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=bootstrap'
3. Edit /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/FedoraReview/deps.py. Change line
83 from:
"dnf repoquery -q -C --requires --resolve " + " ".join(list(set(pkgs))),
to:
"dnf repoquery -q -C --requires " + " ".join(list(set(pkgs))),
Change line 97 from:
name = line.rsplit(".", 2)[0]
to:
name = resolve_one(line)[0].rsplit(".", 2)[0]
Change line 286 from:
"dnf repoquery -C -l " + " ".join(list(set(pkgs))),
to:
"dnf repoquery --files " + " ".join(list(set(pkgs))),
Other changes may be needed.
[*] Altering rpm-controlled files is generally a bad idea, and I do not
recommend it. I am only doing so in this case because fedora-review does
not work at all without these changes. I understand that my changes will
be overwritten the next time a mock-core-configs or fedora-review update
is installed.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
