On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 2:23 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Samantha Bueno <sbu...@redhat.com> writes:
> > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora
> > > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well.
> >
> > For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a
> > quick reference for our paths forward?  Er, backward?  I upgraded at the
> > wrong time and spent half a day recovering my system, I'd rather avoid
> > that if I have to go back to DNF04...
>
> I would expect a revert back to where /usr/bin/dnf is dnf4 (but
> hopefully dnf5 is still available/seperate).
>
> Hopefully that can happen before branching in a few weeks.
>

With the intention of carrying two versions side by side for a while
longer, does it make sense to use alternatives for this?

It might be more work than it's worth. However, it would be nice to have
`dnf4`, `dnf5` and `dnf` commands all available with the default easily
configurable.

-- 
Jonathan Steffan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to