On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 07:22:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > Whoa, that's too many, I suspect misreporting.
Could be. > I seriously doubt they were all really using DSA-1024 and switched over. > But if that really was the case --- great job to all of them. > > > The list from there: > > Google Chrome (RPM signature rejected, repo key rejected) > Repo has added RSA-4096, RPM is signed with SHA-512, installs > > > Microsoft Edge (repo key rejected) > RSA-2048, RPM is signed with SHA-256, installs > > > Dropbox (repo key rejected) > RSA-2048, RPM is signed with SHA-512 > > > Skype (repo key rejected) > RSA-2048 / SHA-512 > > > Visual Studio Code (repo key rejected) > RSA-2048 / SHA-256 (let's name a package `code`. outstanding move) > > > Sublime Text (repo key rejected) > RSA-4096 / SHA-256 > > > Microsoft Teams (repo key rejected) > RSA-2048, but https://packages.microsoft.com/yumrepos/ms-teams/repodata > looks barren > > > TeamViewer (repo key rejected) > RSA-4096 / SHA-256 Nice. Yeah, then it seems like this may well be a time to try again. I look forward to the change. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
