On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:19 AM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Dne 31. 10. 23 v 18:21 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:47 PM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> How it conflicts? >> >> %files >> >> %license LICENSE >> >> %files doc >> >> %license LICENSE >> >> should not create any conflicts. And this is recomended way to do it. > > > I guess the conflicts happen when the LICENSE file changes between builds and > individual subpackages that ship it aren't updated in lock step. Often there > is a full NVR version requirement that locks individual subpackages together, > but not in this case. If people for example download just one of the > subpackages from koji (and not the other), it can lead to only one of them > getting updated. > > License from subpackage goes to different directory. See: > > $ rpm -qf /usr/share/licenses/llvm/LICENSE.TXT > llvm-17.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 > $ rpm -qf /usr/share/licenses/llvm-libs/LICENSE.TXT > llvm-libs-17.0.2-1.fc39.x86_64 > > llvm-libs-17.0.2-1.fc39.i686 > > so license from llvm and llvm-libs should not never conflicts because the > file goes to different directory. > > What can conflict is multilib packages in different version with different > content of the file. >
The cmake-doc package reuses the license and doc directories from the main package and ships them. That's why the conflict exists. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
