Hi,
On Seg, 2015-11-30 at 12:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [...]
> > In this link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelin
> > es#Pre-Release_packages ;
> > where we read :
> >
> > Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages:
> >
> > 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
> >
> > And I'm proposing :
> >
> > 0[.%{X}].%{alphatag}[.%{Y}]%{?dist}
> >
> > is just better IMHO .
>
> Personally, I think it's too complicated due to the optional nature
> of X and Y parts and it's just as easy to get wrong if subsequent
> alphatag breaks release monontonicity and the package maintainer
> doesn't notice it.
>
> With X being currently mandatory, at least you know you must always
> increase it every time you update the package, so monotonicity is
> preserved.
Other argument that I forgot to mention is: this is an extension of
first version so nobody needs change his package naming and is an
extension in two ways :
1 - Possibility of begin with 0 , before was need be: 0.%{X}
2 - Possibility of write in right .
The current: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
Extension 1: 0[.%{X}].%{alphatag}%{?dist}
Extension 2: 0[.%{X}].%{alphatag}[.%{Y}]%{?dist}
I'd like to have permission to use in some of "my" packages.
> Regards,
> Dominik
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
