On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 07.12.15 10:48, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On 04.12.2015 15:57, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Tue, 01.12.15 11:15, Tomas Hozza (tho...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > As you've said, this is basically an attack and hijacking of someone's > > else domain name space. It is not correct and it is not expected that > > this will work with DNSSEC. > > Humm, I find that way too cavalier... I am pretty sure this is a total > deal breaker for your feature. You cannot just break everybody's > network and not consider that a problem that *you* have to think about > rather than just ignoring it completely. not everyones network - I allways use the IP to access routers. It should be a feature of unbound to find the router and offer a stable DNS pseudo-entry for that. Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
