On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in
f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by
some other gnome packages.
I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates separately.
Can you wait with this until we are out of the alpha freeze and gnome
3.20.0 builds have gone stable? Like, until early next week or so? This
should give it a bit time to shake out any libgit2 bugs in rawhide too
before pushing it to F24.
I am confused now, I thought libgit2-glib needed libgit 0.24.0 ? Or is the
libgit2-glib that needs the newer libgit2 not in the update yet?
Right; a libgit2-glib 0.24.0 update would have to go out together with a
libgit2 update. I don't intend to include that in the GNOME 3.20.0
megaupdate and would much prefer if we could do these separately. It's
just easier to QA if we can split up things a bit here. (Read: I don't
want subsurface or kate not working blocking my GNOME update going
stable :))
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
