On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Jonathan Underwood < jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 March 2016 at 05:14, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 > >> This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me > realize > >> that I probably should have named the package python-breathe instead of > >> breathe. Is that correct? If so, what's the right way to fix this? > > > > The name of the .src.rpm isn't really super important and changing it > > is a bit of a pain (you have to do a package rename request which is > > more or less like going through package review again). However, it > > *would* be good to follow the latest Python binary package naming > > recommendations, which are to have 'python2-breathe' and 'python3- > > breathe' and use the python_provides macro so that right now the > > python2-breathe package will provide 'python-breathe', but that can > > potentially change in future (that's what the macro is meant to take > > care of). > > > > The example spec in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python is > > really what all python specs should look like, ideally. The only > > wrinkle is if you want to build your package for EPEL, especially EPEL > > 6; a lot of the recommended macros don't exist there so you will either > > have to maintain that branch separately in git, or have a bunch of > > conditionals in the spec to handle the missing macros for EPEL 6. > > If you do want to push ahead with a package rename, cc me on the > bugzilla ticket, and I'll happily review it for you. The package > rename process is described here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process > The package is pretty simple and so I'll just do the rename: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438 Thanks, Dave
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
