On 07/12/15 05:07 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:29:24AM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On 12/02/2015 05:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> >>>> On 3 Dec 2015, at 10:23 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> For backward compatibility, the (brand new!) notification-agent and >>>> notification-recipient cluster properties would be kept as deprecated >>>> shortcuts for a single notify script and recipient. >>> >>> Actually, that didn't make it into an upstream release. >>> So we could just pretend it never happened :) >>> >>> Sure its in RHEL but we haven’t advertised it yet and it can be our problem >>> to do backwards compatibility for - no need to inflict that on upstream. >> >> OK, we'll leave notifications as an undocumented/unsupported technology >> preview in 1.1.14, with significant interface changes expected in a >> later version. Users can play with it if they want, but with the >> understanding that their configs/scripts will need changes to work with >> future versions. > > It is overly optimistic to expect this. We have a problem people > reading any documentation at all, let alone whether a certain > thing is technology preview. I'd be wary of adding new features > in a released version for which interface is going to change. > > Thanks, > > Dejan
What about having an 'enable_tech_preview_features="true"' (or something) option? -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers