On 12/02/18 08:04, Jan Friesse wrote: > Ken Gaillot napsal(a): >> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 12:52 -0500, Digimer wrote: >>> On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> there is certainly whole can of these worms, put first that crosses >>>> my mind: performing double (de)compression on two levels of >>>> abstraction >>>> in the inter-node communication is not very clever, to put it >>>> mildly. >>>> >>>> So far, just pacemaker was doing that for itself under certain >>>> conditions, now corosync 3 will have it's iron in this fire through >>>> kronosnet, too. Perhaps something to keep in mind to avoid >>>> exercises in futility. >>> >>> Can pacemaker be told to not do compression? If not, can that be >>> added >>> in pacemaker v2? >> >> Or better yet, is there some corosync API call we can use to determine >> whether corosync/knet is using compression? > > Sure. Just read "totem.knet_compression_model" cmap key. If it doesn't > exists or is "none", compression is disabled. >
Which is the default. Chrissie _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers