John,

Your message below is easy to summarize  succinctly, thanks.

At 09:48 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
>
>Chris , ZL1BOE
>
>you will be told by others that ALE is widely 
>used to set up QSO’s and QSY’s using the one 
>line message ability . You will also be told 
>that it is used widely for keyboard to keyboard 
>QSO’s and that there are thousands of Hams using 
>ALE ( last figure I heard was 6000) . These are 
>folks who are using PCALE, who have aggressively 
>set aside frequencies for ALE use in all bands, 
>and are promoting ALE as the answer to emergency communications.

FALSE


>
>Granted, PCALE, in its MARS form may be a great 
>piece of software to pass messages from overseas

TRUE

NOTE: MARS does not make use of ALE for OCONUS traffic relay.

>  but that ability is certainly not evident on the ham bands.

FALSE


>
>The reality is that there are likely under 50 
>hams active with PCALE  worldwide, those using 
>PCALE spend most of the time sounding , with 
>little , if any message traffic passed, and no 
>QSO’s. PCALE does not work very well into the 
>noise, and is certainly not user friendly when 
>setting up a rig and computer to run the 
>program. Beyond using the sounding function 
>there appears not to be much interest in running 
>nets, or exploring emergency communications aspect of PCALE.

FALSE


>
>ALE400 (multiPSK) might be closer to your needs 
>since it is narrow band and works well into the 
>noise. It can be readily used for soundings, 
>file transfer, and is a pleasure to use for 
>digital QSO’s, keyboard to keyboard. The author 
>is constantly working on the software, and 
>appears to be moving closer to the Holy Grail of 
>being able to pass messages and files from HF to 
>the internet. It is simple to install, simple to 
>use, (although the screen can be a little 
>overwhelming at first)  .There is a plan afoot 
>which would see some extensive cross Canada 
>testing of this mode to determine it’s 
>suitability for emergency communications.

TRUE


>
>There are some other software out there to look 
>at. NBEMS has promise, but , since it uses BPSK 
>for the most part, suffers from multipath 
>flutter and other ozone maladies. The authors 
>state that it’s intention was to run over 
>VHF/UHF, and , while I haven’t tried it, would 
>probably work very well. This software is also 
>under active development so will be interesting 
>to see what other capabilities it will have.

TRUE


>
>RFSM8000  gets very little mention  on these 
>reflectors, since hams in the USA cannot exceed 
>300baud speed. Dimitry and his team have posted 
>the latest version which looks interesting , but 
>haven’t tried it, but is something we can run 
>here in Canada on most bands except 30m.( 
>bandwidth issues rather than speed)  It 
>apparently has the ability to pass traffic to 
>and from the internet from HF, using a sound card modem.

TRUE


>
>So much software, so little time……….

SO TRUE

/s/ Steve, N2CKH


>
>73’s John
>VE5MU
>

Reply via email to