Aw, pshaw. I am sorry that I hurt your delicate sensitivities, Bill. Get over it. All this political and administrative bs has absolutely nothing to do with digitalradio. It is one clique fighting with another clique. One group is asking for clarification about the other group's operation. How is that OK?
If you think that I am not allowed to express my opinion, then you prove my point. However, I will not stand by without comment and get wet from your pissing contest. And I will not stand by while less than 0.5 percent of the US amateur radio operators mucks around and potentially screws it up for the other 99.5 percent. It was small groups of activists that got us in the incentive licensing fix, and it was small groups of activists that got us in the separation by bandwidth fix. It will be this small group of activists that makes the next change happen. I just hope the trend doesn't continue to worse and worse and worse. Chuck AA5J At 05:54 PM 1/13/2008, Bill McLaughlin wrote: >Ok, I admit it, I mandated Rick to ask questions. Bull But seriously, why the concern about asking for clarification? And >yes, it does seem personal. > >73, > >Bill N9DSJ > >--- In ><mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, >Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > > At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote: > > >My preference would have been for those who want to operate these kinds > > >of modes to request an interpretation and if the finding was not to > > >their satisfaction, to petition the FCC for a rule change. They did not > > >do this and now some of us have had to take action and do it in their > > >place. > > > > > > So, Rick, from whom did you get your mandate to take action? > > It certainly was not me. I don't even use any of those modes, > > but I do not appreciate activists who have to "take action" when > > nothing is necessarily wrong. If you want to feel powerful, > > why don't you run for office or something? > > > > Don't take this personally, please. > > > > 73, > > Chuck AA5J > > > > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1221 - Release Date: >1/12/2008 2:04 PM
