Looks like good news Steinar! If the data changes the frequencies, it
does not qualify as FHSS as Jose originally claimed. I am sure the FCC
will find the same during their tests and expect them to say it can be
used on HF and VHF. I am especially interested in being able to use the
1 baud mode for EME on 2m and right now, FHSS is not permitted below 222
MHz. However, we will have to wait for the FCC to issue a new opinion,
since they already issued one based on Jose's original claims.
73 - Skip KH6TY
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Skip
Here is the new ROS signal. It is idling with two gruops of 25 sec of
X's . As you can see the pattern change when sending data.
http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/ROS_X_2.JPG
<http://home.broadpark.no/%7Esaanes/bilder/ROS_X_2.JPG>
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
On 27.02.2010 13:19, KH6TY wrote:
> That's a good analysis, Steinar. Is it possible to see if the pattern
> changes when sending data? That is all the FCC is concerned about. The
> pattern has to change when sending data and not just remain the same
> to exclude it from being FHSS.
>
> 73 - Skip KH6TY
>
