Why not just limit bandwidth of any emission to 500 Hz?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Andy obrien wrote:
FYI, I plan to file a comment opposing the PIII on 60M proposal. My
objections are
PIII is a proprietary mode .
PIII as used in non-busy detect Winkink system has been the leading
cause of QRM complaints for the past 10 years, hence they are likely
to cause the same for the primary services that have 60M allocations.
Recent tests of NBEMS with FLICS and WRAP have proven as effective as
PIII and take up less spectrum (and are not proprietary)
Winmor 500 offers most of the Winlink capabilities without the
problems associated with wide PIII and is freely available to all hams.
I will probably suggest that they authorize PS31, MFSK16 and Winmor
500 if they are going to get mode specific.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Dave Wright <hfradio...@gmail.com
<mailto:hfradio...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
Rick Ellison writes:
"recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit all publicly-documented data modes "
So, has Pactor III every been publicly-documented???
Dave
K3DCW
Real radio bounces off the sky
--
