You are most welcome Mike   I see you in my log
N7NMS, 2010/06/28 01:04:59,

I am employed by a hospital system and serve on their Disaster Preparedness
Committee, so I will be interested in your efforts too.

Andy K3UK

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike <n7...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> Andy,
>
> Iam new to Winmor and my interest is for local EMCOMM to support the
> hospital systems. I have been using RMS express for a week or so and I have
> successfully connected to K3UK-5 a couple of times from Western MD. Sorry I
> don't have details on the connects, but thanks for the station being out
> there.
>
> 73 de N7NMS
> Mike
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, Andy
> obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote:
> >
> > OK, I did it. No, I have not become a Pactor III BBS but I have set
> > up a 24/7 WINMOR Winlink 2000 server station.... with busy detect
> > active at the server end preventing my response to a connect request
> > if the frequency is busy.. This station will use 500 Hz Winmor. The
> > first couple of stations connecting to the server (K3UK-5) all passed
> > traffic to the CMS server OK. I need to study frequencies more and
> > make sure that I eventually choose frequencies that make sense .
> > During the next few days I will test on
> >
> >
> >
> > 0500 to 1400 on USB 3584.5 (dial 3583).
> > 1400-1600 USB 7084.8 (dial 7083.3)
> > 1600-0100 USB 28125 dial
> > 2100-0500 USB 7084.8 (dial 7083.3)
> >
> >
> > 10M is NOT a mistake. There are no servers on 10M and I hope to test
> > this out some more. I may also try 6M.
> >
> > To use the server, you need RMS express software, which is free. You
> > also need a soundcard (and radio!)
> >
> > I've tried PSKmail , ALE400, and 300 baud packet Pbbs over the past
> > few months. PSKMAIL is VERY good but the Linux requirement for the
> > server operations was more than i was willing to mess around with.
> > So, I will give the WINMOR winlink server a try for the next 90 days
> > and then evaluate how utilized it is. This will also give me a great
> > opportunity to fully study the busy detect features that appear to
> > work quite well at the moment.
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to