You are most welcome Mike I see you in my log N7NMS, 2010/06/28 01:04:59,
I am employed by a hospital system and serve on their Disaster Preparedness Committee, so I will be interested in your efforts too. Andy K3UK On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike <n7...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Andy, > > Iam new to Winmor and my interest is for local EMCOMM to support the > hospital systems. I have been using RMS express for a week or so and I have > successfully connected to K3UK-5 a couple of times from Western MD. Sorry I > don't have details on the connects, but thanks for the station being out > there. > > 73 de N7NMS > Mike > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, Andy > obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote: > > > > OK, I did it. No, I have not become a Pactor III BBS but I have set > > up a 24/7 WINMOR Winlink 2000 server station.... with busy detect > > active at the server end preventing my response to a connect request > > if the frequency is busy.. This station will use 500 Hz Winmor. The > > first couple of stations connecting to the server (K3UK-5) all passed > > traffic to the CMS server OK. I need to study frequencies more and > > make sure that I eventually choose frequencies that make sense . > > During the next few days I will test on > > > > > > > > 0500 to 1400 on USB 3584.5 (dial 3583). > > 1400-1600 USB 7084.8 (dial 7083.3) > > 1600-0100 USB 28125 dial > > 2100-0500 USB 7084.8 (dial 7083.3) > > > > > > 10M is NOT a mistake. There are no servers on 10M and I hope to test > > this out some more. I may also try 6M. > > > > To use the server, you need RMS express software, which is free. You > > also need a soundcard (and radio!) > > > > I've tried PSKmail , ALE400, and 300 baud packet Pbbs over the past > > few months. PSKMAIL is VERY good but the Linux requirement for the > > server operations was more than i was willing to mess around with. > > So, I will give the WINMOR winlink server a try for the next 90 days > > and then evaluate how utilized it is. This will also give me a great > > opportunity to fully study the busy detect features that appear to > > work quite well at the moment. > > > > >