That, and the fact that if you believe the author's original description of ROS 
that it uses spread spectrum, then it's not legal in the US on bands lower than 
220.   What's frustrating about the FCC rule is that ROS appears to use a 
relatively narrow band form of frequency hopping spread spectrum, so while the 
FCC prohibition of FHSS below 220 might be defensible for the original wider 
bandwidth SS, it becomes much harder to defend in the case of ROS.  In fact, I 
don't remember reading any posts on any email lists that believe the current 
rule  (with a blanket prohibition of all forms of SS) makes sense.  But, right 
now at least, that's the rule in the US.

   Jim - K6JM

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "John Becker, WØJAB" 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:40 AM
  Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS


    
  If one was to just disconnect from the net would the program
  later try to post?

  It seems that this is the main concern of many?

  John, W0JAB
  EM49lk


Reply via email to