On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Charles Jenkins <cejw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm with you on the UI design, Keith. The way software looks influences how > people perceive its capability, and LO looks like something from the 90's. I > like your design because it's attractive, yet leaves the menus in place for > those users who can't get into using the ribbon. > > Now on the idea of removing VBA… I hate VBA, but I'd rather see LO become > *more* compatible, rather than ditching it. I want LO to become the product > people can switch to, but you close the door on switchers when you reduce > compatibility. I can tell you that for sure because of my own recent > difficulties fixing a macro so automated data export from SAP will work with > LO. > > Step 1: Get the world to use LO as its Office standard. > Step 2: Drop M$ Office compatibility. >
I agree that improving VBA compatibility would be helpful, my point was about extensions written by volunteers. Regards, -Keith -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
